The principle of creation

 

The principle that are being used in ’Scientific revolution’  can also be illustrated as on figure 2:.

Figure 2: Illustration of the principle of creation which is behind every appearance in our universe. The principle, as described in esoteric books, can also be referred to as: The principle of learning, initiation, individuation and fall/ redemption.

 

The figure illustrates the path followed by all complex structures in their development. In the first four stages an inner division occurs in the structure, where a part of the original unity separates out. In stage four the division is at its highest, which means that the condition of the structure or organism is characterized by the lowest degree of flow occurring in the process. Another expression for this is that the state of being at stage 4 is in disharmony with the wholeness. The separation occurring in stage one to four is referred to as ’ZimZum’ in the Kabbalah:

 

Zimzum

A term from Lurianic Kabbalah meaning the contraction of the Ain Sof to form a "space" into which all of creation would manifest. God still fills this space, like the fragrance of a rose lingers after it leaves the room. This is the first appearance of the "separation" between God and the Universe necessary for manifestation. In order for anything to become distinct and visible, something else must become invisible. A foreground is not visible unless there is a background. This is the first appearance of the Abyss and also

of Knowledge. By the very act of separation God imposes ignorance or latency on Himself in order to create. This ignorance is simultaneously the birth of Knowledge.

 

This separation creates a knowledge in the structure, but the price is that something else is forgotten. In Jungs terminology the organism has become neurotic. It can be compared to the sitation where a person plays Hamlet in the local amateur theatre, and forgets that it is only a part he is playing. In his own mind he is Hamlet. When he leaves the stage he remains in his role, and walks around in the village in a rather tragi-comic custume, saying his lines. When his friends and others tells him that he is not Hamlet, he shuts off and will not listen. If the Hamlet-role has a firm grip in the person, it will neither help if his own wife tells him that his name is infact Andrew Smith and they have a carport only half finished back home at Blueberry-street 4. On the contrary he will stick to his role even more forcefully and probably show his anger (repressed frustation) towards the poor wife, who - seen from his neurotic point of view - is a threat. It is the neurotic Hamlet structure in his consciousness that struggles against letting go. To wake him up you have to play along on his terms so to speak. The wife can for example pretend to be Ophelia and gain his trust by acting like her. Then she can during the conversation hiddenly refer to the knowledge he has as Andrew Smith. If for instance his father had problems with the kidneys, she can ask if his (Hamlets) father had any kidney problems or she can ”by mistake” utter words that are off topic, which she knows refer to something the Andrew Smith identity knows. In this way she activates and build a complex of knowledge in the unconscious part of his mind, which she has the key to trigger since she has build it. The process softens the barrier between his ’Andrew Smith’-identity and his Hamlet-identity. When she sense that its the right time, she looks deep in his eyes and says ”Andrew come home!” or something similar. If the process succeeds he starts the journey from stage 4 to 7 (see figure 2), after ”finding his balance”. In this way psycologist heals personality-splits and other neuroses.

 

The transition

Today many people have woken up and has moved past stage 4, without they necessarily use these terms. They just know, like Neo in the Matrix, that something is ”not right”. These people are now organizing their efforts to heal the division, not least thanks to the Internet, and thereby paves the way for a new paradigm which will have a profound effect on our society,

 

The proces are shown on figure 3.

Figure 3: The change from the old to the new paradigm. Those working for the new paradigm (hatched ellipsis)

had diffuculties to get along on the old conditions, they are now in the proces of organizing their troops.

 

The following keywords illustrates the difference between the two paradigms:

We are now in the middle of the battle between the two paradigms, the outcome is certain, the question is merely how easy the transition will occur. The battle are illustrated brilliantly by one of Gary Larsons cartoons, where the hunter is the old paradigm and the moose is the new paradigm:

”Ok, just relax friend… eeeaaaasy….. I’m coming towards you now,

and then you just pass me the riffle… nice and easy… everything is allright, friend.”

 

Enjoy the game! J

Johan Tino Frederiksen

Previous page

Back to articles

 

The article in pdf

… or in word

Detailed image

(from the article Colline - how learning progress in an artificial organism)